Canopus Neo Vintage M4 Snare Drum


Not long ago, we took a look at the Canopus Yoshihito Eto signature snare drum (go check out the review and watch the video – excellent drum). In that same shipment, the good people at Canopus were nice enough to ship over two drums from their Neo Vintage series. Each of the snares in this series recalls a notable vintage drum design or aesthetic, but updates it with modern appointments. Really, they all seem a little outside the box conceptually – in a cool way.

I’m going to split these drums up into separate reviews to make sure they get their due attention. Let’s start with the M4, an instrument with two very distinct design elements.

Name: NV70-M4 (4th of Neo-vintage series)

Shell: 5ply Maple + Poplar 9mm

Finish: Superior Maple Lacquer

Size: 6.5 x 14

Top Hoop: 12 hole 2.3mm steel round edge hoop with interior top flange

Bottom Hoop: 6 hole 2.3mm steel round edge hoop with interior top flange

Snare Wire: Non-plated Canopus vintage wire (CPSL-14DR)

Lug: Japanese sword separate lug

Price: $918.57 at Drum Center of Portsmouth


Before we jump into the write-up, let me give you some background on the M4 with copy straight from the horse’s (Canopus’) mouth.

“The NEO VINTAGE M4 is based upon the technology and specifications of some outstanding drum designs from the 1970s. Its unique design features 12 tension rods on top and 6 on the bottom. A 5 ply maple and thicker poplar shell construction, and Canopus’ precision bearing edge shaping, combine to create a characteristically “mellow and dry” vintage sound. With these specifications – providing a blend of tight attack and a comfortable, loose reverberation, it is a totally unique instrument. Certainly, this conspicuous sound will be highly prized and sought-after by a great many drummers.”

So, in summary, it’s a 14×6.5” drum with twelve lugs on the batter side, six lugs on the snare side and a thick, 9mm, five-ply shell featuring an alternating layup of three ultra-thin maple plies and two much thicker poplar plies.


Visually, it’s a head-turner for sure simply because of the lug layout. Beyond that shiny chrome hardware, however, it sports a glossy natural maple finish with the tiniest bit of mottling in the wood grain. I’m not sure what that very faint speckling could be attributed to (it might not even be on all models, but it was on our review drum), but it added a nice touch of visual depth to the otherwise conventional exterior.

The drum was constructed beautifully. It was perfectly round at all points, lug mount holes were clean and even, and the edges and beds were smooth all around. Speaking of edges, they were a gently rounded at the contact point with a very shallow and short outside cut, and a long, deep inside cut. A synthetic/steel/synthetic trio of stacked washers on each rod helped the drum tune easily and maintain tension. The inside ply did have a noticeable overlap seam (pictured) – something I’ve not seen often – but if it affected the sound at all, I couldn’t tell.

Interior ply overlap and maple/poplar/maple/poplar/maple ply layout

Sonically, the M4 was a total throwback. Unsurprisingly, it was very warm with a deep, woody core note that stayed consistent throughout all tunings. The drum did surprise me with an unexpectedly dry finish though, which I thoroughly enjoyed. I was expecting something more overtone-heavy with lots of rich, sweet sustain. Instead, I was treated to a tight abbreviated note that reminded me a bit of a throatier version of Al Jackson Jr.’s sound on “Sittin’ On The Dock Of The Bay”. The drum didn’t play like it was muffled, and it had plenty of life, but I was consistently surprised by how concise the notes were.

And, I think a big part of that sound came from the shell configuration detailed above. I imagine the softness of those thick slabs of poplar really help soak up some of the wilder highs coming through the drum like acoustic insulation recessed in wall paneling. The result is a controlled, clear sound that somehow retains the gushy roundness of vintage drums, especially at low to medium tunings. That helped make the M4 an outstanding recording drum. I think microphones will absolutely love it. Mine sure did.


I used the M4 on a recording that called for a chunky Heartbreakers-esque groove with a beefy, sure-footed backbeat. I was going for a tubby, muffled sound on most of the tracks for this record, but kept the gel dampening to a bare minimum when I pulled out the M4. Too much muffling squashed the drum’s rich center, and its innate dryness kept it from ringing over the mics. The compressed result gave me the lively, sensitive response of an un-muffled snare with the pillow-y puff of a studio drum sporting a small wallet on top. That sound persisted when I tuned the drum up high, giving me a meatier, warmer version of the tone on “Mother Popcorn”.

One issue I did encounter with the M4 was that it sounded a little thin in larger rooms. I think the end of the note was so dry that it fell a little flat when played without effective miking in a bigger space. That could have been a situational issue, but the reduced depth really jumped out at a show in a 3-500 person capacity room.

Hoops and stacked washers

Additionally, tuning the drum to a near floppy low tension was more difficult than I expected. I’m not sure where the problem was exactly, but as I would approach the near-wrinkle zone, the rods would lose tension all together. I’m not sure if the rods were a hair too short or if the extra rigidity of the 12-hole hoop simply kept the head tension more even until the rod fully backed out. Either way, it didn’t really prove to be that much of a problem, as that same rigidity helped the drum sound lower and fatter even when the head felt fairly snug at every lug point.

Elsewhere, the added dryness of the CPSL-14DR wires helped contain the drum’s response even further. The throw – the same unit found on the Eto drum featured in our last Canopus review – was simple and reliable despite looking a little flimsy at first blush. Stock Remo heads made the drum ready to go right out of the box. I didn’t change either head before recording with it.

Wrap Up

The Canopus Neo Vintage M4 snare drum might look unconventional, but it produces a very familiar sound. The dry, fat tone of a hybrid maple and poplar shell is bolstered by the extra beef of its 6.5” depth, and the result is a fat, 1970’s rock sound that kills in the studio. I think it works best with a microphone on top as it came across just a bit thin without one in a medium to large sized room, but it performed beautifully through a PA or mixing board. Like, really, really beautifully.

7 thoughts on “Canopus Neo Vintage M4 Snare Drum

  1. You sometimes feel as though you’re babysitting a Room Full of Monkeys Fucking a Football when witnessing what a Drum Maker/Designer will do to justify their Phoney-Boloney Job!

    In the words of Maxx Roach “Son, Play The Drum…Don’t Let The Drum Play You”…here we have a Combination of the Most Absurd Relics of the Past 50 Years, to show all of “We Geniuses” just what the Professor was Talking of!

    Gotta Start with the Shell…really can’t Stomach reading the Babbling of another “Glue Baby Glue” Ply Shell Proponent, Sing the Praises of the Latest “Elmer’s Ark”! I took a Quick Glance & it looked like a Filo Dough Greek Dessert! I don’t give a damn how many layers of what ever Exotic Wood you shove in there…IT’S STILL FUCKING PLYWOOD!…ADMIT IT! Admit that you’re selling the Public a Piece of Plywood, pasted together with enough glue to wipeout a small herd of Wild Horses! After that, it’s all window dressing…IT BEGINS & ENDS WITH THE SHELL…PERIOD!

    I see shit like this & it makes me ashamed to be a builder…this is not a commercial about me, not even giving my real name or company name…JUST TELLING THE TRUTH AS I SEE IT!…Let’s see…does that make me a Racist or an Offensive Redneck…or even worse, A FUCKING BANKER!!!! None of the above, just a guy who knows Building Drums isn’t Rocket Surgery…not unless you wanna make it look like it is.

    It’s HARD WORK, but sometimes the Simplest Tasks are the hardest to do Right!…to me, this is insulting garbage! Close your eyes & envision a few exec’s sitting around, and one says “hey, throw 12 lugs on the batter and 6 lugs on the snare…use one of those old thick as shit shells we use for target practice…and we’ll call it some exotic name…like ikky bitchy, after my wife! (they all laugh)….Fungus Out!

    1. Well, that was nuts.

      Almost every drum I own is a ply-shell drum. I’m pretty happy with them. I was pretty happy with this drum too. Maybe it was born out of gimmick for gimmickry’s sake, but it sounds great – and it sounds unlike a lot of other drums I’ve played.

      That said, I’m happy you posted this. It’s always good to hear strong opinions earned from experience. I’d love to know more about your company, Fungus. Please shoot me an email at and let me know.

  2. Good review and a nice looking drum.

    The design Canopus is claiming to replicate didn’t start in the 1970’s though. They needed to do some more homework on that. The design was a Early 1930’s design by builder Frank Wolf in NYC. Slingerland took that design and “rediscovered” it in the 1970’s.

    Still- cool snare!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s